Why Emotional Intelligence Training is Actually Making Managers Worse (And What Smart Companies Are Doing Instead)

Related Articles You Might Find Useful:

• Brand Local Further Resources
• Tag Group Posts

The room went dead quiet when I told the CEO of a major Melbourne consulting firm that their $50,000 emotional intelligence program was creating weaker managers, not stronger ones.

That was three months ago. Today, their retention rates are up 34% and they've scrapped half their EQ training modules. Sometimes the hardest truths are the ones that save you the most money.

Look, I've been in workplace training for seventeen years now, and I'm going to say something that'll probably get me kicked out of the next HR conference: most emotional intelligence training is absolute rubbish. There. Said it.

The Real Problem With EQ Training

Here's what's happening in boardrooms across Australia right now. Managers are coming out of these touchy-feely workshops thinking they need to be everyone's therapist. They're so worried about being "emotionally intelligent" that they've forgotten how to actually manage.

I watched this unfold at a Brisbane tech company just last month. The team leader - let's call him Dave - had just completed his Level 2 Emotional Intelligence certification. Brilliant. Except now Dave was spending forty minutes discussing feelings every time someone missed a deadline.

The project was three weeks behind schedule.

When I asked Dave why he wasn't addressing the performance issue directly, he said he was "creating psychological safety" first. Mate, you know what creates psychological safety? Clear expectations and consistent follow-through. Not endless naval-gazing sessions about how everyone's feeling.

What Actually Works (And Why Nobody Talks About It)

Real emotional intelligence isn't about being touchy-feely. It's about reading the room and responding appropriately. Sometimes that means having the difficult conversation. Sometimes it means knowing when to shut up and listen.

I've seen managers transform their teams by getting back to basics. Take Sarah from a Perth manufacturing company - she ditched the emotional intelligence workbooks and started having weekly one-on-ones where she asked three simple questions:

1. What's working well?
2. What's not working?
3. What do you need from me?

That's it. No personality assessments. No emotion wheels. Just straight talk.

Her team productivity increased by 28% in two months. But here's the kicker - employee satisfaction scores also went through the roof. Turns out people actually prefer managers who are direct and helpful rather than amateur psychologists.

The Australian Way: Common Sense Over Certification

We Australians have always been pretty good at cutting through the BS. So why are we buying into all this overcomplicated emotional intelligence training?

Maybe it's because we're afraid of being seen as too harsh. Maybe it's because some consultant convinced us that having feelings makes us better leaders. Whatever the reason, it's not working.

I've got clients in Adelaide who've spent more on EQ training than they did on their entire IT infrastructure. And what have they got to show for it? Managers who are paralysed by analysis and teams that are crying out for basic direction.

The Stuff Nobody Wants to Hear

Want to know what real emotional intelligence looks like in practice? Here's what I tell my clients:

Sometimes being emotionally intelligent means telling someone their work isn't good enough.

Sometimes it means making unpopular decisions quickly rather than endlessly consulting everyone's feelings.

Sometimes it means knowing that not every workplace conflict needs to be turned into a learning opportunity.

I know this sounds controversial, but I've seen too many good managers become ineffective because they're trying to be everyone's best friend. The best managers I know are fair, consistent, and direct. They care about their people's development, but they don't confuse management with therapy.

What Smart Companies Are Doing Instead

The companies that are actually getting results? They're focusing on practical communication skills instead of abstract emotional concepts.

They're teaching managers how to give feedback that actually changes behaviour. They're showing them how to have difficult conversations without losing their minds or their team's respect.

This isn't about being emotionally stupid. It's about being emotionally strategic.

Take the approach we use with our clients - instead of teaching managers to identify seventeen different types of emotions, we teach them to recognise three key states: engaged, disengaged, and distressed. That's it. Simple, actionable, effective.

The Numbers Don't Lie

Here's what happens when you strip away the fluff and focus on practical people management:

• Average time to resolve workplace conflicts drops by 60%
• Manager confidence increases (because they actually know what to do)
• Team performance improves (because expectations are clear)
• Employee turnover decreases (because people respect competent leadership)

I've tracked these metrics across forty-three companies in the last two years. The pattern is consistent.

But Here's the Thing Nobody Mentions

The emotional intelligence industry doesn't want you to know this, but most workplace emotional challenges aren't actually about emotions. They're about unclear expectations, poor communication systems, and managers who've never been taught how to manage.

You can't solve a structural problem with emotional awareness. You can't fix bad processes with good feelings.

Where This All Goes Wrong

The worst part about badly implemented EQ training? It actually makes managers less confident, not more. When you teach someone that every interaction is fraught with emotional complexity, they start second-guessing every decision.

I've seen managers who used to be decisive become paralysed by the fear of triggering someone's feelings. That's not emotional intelligence. That's emotional paralysis.

The Simple Truth

Here's what seventeen years in this business has taught me: good management is about creating clarity, not complexity. It's about helping people do their best work, not exploring their deepest feelings.

The best managers I know are emotionally intelligent in the way that matters - they notice when someone's struggling and they do something practical about it. They don't need a certification to tell them when to listen and when to act.

Maybe it's time we stopped overcomplicating something that should be straightforward. Maybe it's time we got back to training managers to actually manage.

Because at the end of the day, your team doesn't need you to be their emotional guru. They need you to be a competent leader who gives a damn about their success.

And that's something you can't learn from a workbook.

Our Favorite Training Resources: Check out some practical alternatives at Learning Network for straightforward management development.